<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SF Universe &#187; Ang Lee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sfuniverse.com/tag/ang-lee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sfuniverse.com</link>
	<description>SF Universe is your Science Fiction central. From SciFi television to movies to books and more. All the latest news, reviews and insights from SciFi experts. </description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Meet New Hulk, Same Take As Old Hulk</title>
		<link>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2008/07/10/meet-new-hulk-same-take-as-old-hulk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2008/07/10/meet-new-hulk-same-take-as-old-hulk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books & Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ang Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incredible Hulk Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marvel Studios]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfuniverse.com/2008/07/10/meet-new-hulk-same-take-as-old-hulk/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ An interesting column at the Hollywood Reporter notes that in spite of much more positive reviews from fans and critics, the new Hulk movie will pull in about what the first one did.
I&#8217;ve mentioned that I think the revamp is a lot better and infinitely more &#8220;summer box office&#8221; film. Ang Lee&#8217;s take would have been cool for an unestablished hero but most people feel like they know what Hulk is about. Wild new interpretations like &#8220;madder Hulk get, bigger Hulk get&#8221; didn&#8217;t sit well with diehard comic book geeks or casual filmgoers.
It seems that for whatever reason, Hulk [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sfuniverse.com">SF Universe</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sfuniverse.com/files/2008/07/ed-norton-thumb.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="186" alt="ed-norton-thumb" src="http://www.sfuniverse.com/files/2008/07/ed-norton-thumb-thumb.jpg" width="244" align="left" border="0"></a> An interesting column at the <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com">Hollywood Reporter</a> notes that in spite of much more positive reviews from fans and critics, the new <strong>Hulk</strong> movie will pull in about what the first one did.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve mentioned that I think the revamp is a lot better and infinitely more &#8220;summer box office&#8221; film. Ang Lee&#8217;s take would have been cool for an unestablished hero but most people feel like they know what Hulk is about. Wild new interpretations like <strong>&#8220;madder Hulk get, bigger Hulk get&#8221; </strong>didn&#8217;t sit well with diehard comic book geeks or casual filmgoers.</p>
<p>It seems that for whatever reason, Hulk isn&#8217;t as profitable as the likes of the <strong>X-Men</strong> and <strong>Spider-Man.</strong>&nbsp; I can&#8217;t quite put my finger on it, as Hulk is one of those characters even people that have never read a comic book know about. Perhaps Hulk&#8217;s greatest nemesis will be the mainstream film industry.</p>
<p><em>Photo: Edward Norton, The Incredible Hulk, Marvel Studios, 2008</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sfuniverse.com">SF Universe</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2008/07/10/meet-new-hulk-same-take-as-old-hulk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Disavow Any Knowledge of the Hulk</title>
		<link>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2008/05/28/we-disavow-any-knowledge-of-the-hulk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2008/05/28/we-disavow-any-knowledge-of-the-hulk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 02:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ang Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulk Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incredible Hulk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfuniverse.com/2008/05/28/we-disavow-any-knowledge-of-the-hulk/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ That is to say, Marvel Studios is largely pretending Ang Lee&#8217;s dialogue heavy, action-light take on the Incredible Hulk didn&#8217;t happen. The studio&#8217;s president Kevin Feige told Sci Fi Wire the 2003 film will be summed up in an entrance montage. He compares it to the opening of the classic Hulk TV series.

Marvel&#8217;s hope is that fans who didn&#8217;t see the first film will get all the backstory they need and be ready to rock with the new movie. I worry if Marvel&#8217;s going too far in its retreat from Hulk. I mean good grief, they&#8217;re treating this movie [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sfuniverse.com">SF Universe</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sfuniverse.com/files/2008/05/ed-norton.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="185" alt="Ed Norton" src="http://www.sfuniverse.com/files/2008/05/ed-norton-thumb.jpg" width="244" align="left" border="0"></a> That is to say, <strong>Marvel Studios </strong>is largely pretending <strong>Ang Lee&#8217;s</strong> dialogue heavy, action-light take on the <strong>Incredible Hulk</strong> didn&#8217;t happen. The studio&#8217;s president <strong>Kevin Feige </strong>told Sci Fi Wire the 2003 film will be summed up in an entrance montage. He compares it to the opening of the classic Hulk TV series.</p>
<p><span id="more-1746"></span></p>
<p>Marvel&#8217;s hope is that fans who didn&#8217;t see the first film will get all the backstory they need and be ready to rock with the new movie. I worry if Marvel&#8217;s going too far in its retreat from Hulk. I mean good grief, they&#8217;re treating this movie like it was <strong>Elektra</strong> or something. I really thought the only one that needed to be replaced was the director.</p>
<p>With a Hulk that grew in size proportionate to his anger and was also ridiculously fast, Lee had created a being that didn&#8217;t have any visible weakness. That is of course, unless some other character in the mythos undergoes a power upgrade that happens at deus ex machina speed. It could be argued that the comic book&#8217;s writers did the same thing last summer but that&#8217;s another column.</p>
<p><strong>Sentry</strong>, meet <strong>Nick Nolte</strong>. <strong>Nick Nolte</strong>, meet <strong>Sentry</strong>. Have some coffee, talk amongst yourselves about the ridiculously contrived ways in which you almost beat the Hulk. O.K, I swear we&#8217;re moving on. Marvel knocked it out of the park with <strong>Iron Man.&nbsp; </strong>Here&#8217;s hoping they keep the momentum going.</p>
<p><em>Photo: Edward Norton, The Incredible Hulk, Marvel Studios, 2008</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sfuniverse.com">SF Universe</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2008/05/28/we-disavow-any-knowledge-of-the-hulk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
