<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SF Universe &#187; X-Men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sfuniverse.com/tag/x-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sfuniverse.com</link>
	<description>SF Universe is your Science Fiction central. From SciFi television to movies to books and more. All the latest news, reviews and insights from SciFi experts. </description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 01:00:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Wolverine Takes $87 Million Cut of Box Office</title>
		<link>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2009/05/04/wolverine-takes-87-million-cut-of-box-office/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2009/05/04/wolverine-takes-87-million-cut-of-box-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 02:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books & Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugh Jackman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marvel Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolverine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-Men Origins: Wolverine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfuniverse.com/2009/05/04/wolverine-takes-87-million-cut-of-box-office/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ He&#8217;s the best there is at what he does, and what he does is kick off the summer box office in grand style. X-Men Origins:Wolverine raked in $87 million over the weekend to of course, earn the no. 1 spot.
Doesn&#8217;t look like a leaked copy of the film sans special effects had any impact, unless it was to increase anticipation for the finished product. Bringing in that kind of cash, it&#8217;s almost a certainty we&#8217;ll see more X-films. As a matter of fact, as long as these things keep making money, X-Men Origins:That Mutant That Was In One Scene [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sfuniverse.com">SF Universe</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sfuniverse.com/files/2009/05/90428a2-jackman-b-gr-08.jpg"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" border="0" alt="90428A2_JACKMAN_B-GR_08" align="left" src="http://www.sfuniverse.com/files/2009/05/90428a2-jackman-b-gr-08-thumb.jpg" width="254" height="351"></a> He&#8217;s the best there is at what he does, and what he does is kick off the summer box office in grand style.<em> X-Men Origins:Wolverine </em>raked in $87 million over the weekend to of course, earn the <a href="http://www.hollywood.com/boxoffice">no. 1 spot.</a></p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t look like a leaked copy of the film sans special effects had any impact, unless it was to increase anticipation for the finished product. Bringing in that kind of cash, it&#8217;s almost a certainty we&#8217;ll see more X-films. As a matter of fact, as long as these things keep making money, <em>X-Men Origins:That Mutant That Was In One Scene in X-Men 2 </em>is not out of the realm of possibility.</p>
<p><em>Heroes</em> star Ali Larter is turning heads in <em>Obsessed</em>, a thriller that paints her as a psychopath trying to steal Beyonce Knowles&#8217; man.&nbsp; Ali Larter or Beyonce? Only in the movies are men faced with such decisions. <em>Obsessed </em>cost only $20 million but has already pulled in nearly $50 million.</p>
<p>As for our favorite mutant, he will likely only have a one week reign at the top as a little <em>Star Trek </em>movie opens next week. It is a great time to be alive, SFUniverse faithful.</p>
<p><em>Image: Bauer-Griffin</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sfuniverse.com">SF Universe</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2009/05/04/wolverine-takes-87-million-cut-of-box-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plan To See Wolverine? Seen It Already?</title>
		<link>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2009/04/17/plan-to-see-wolverine-seen-it-already/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2009/04/17/plan-to-see-wolverine-seen-it-already/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marvel Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolverine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-Men Origins: Wolverine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfuniverse.com/2009/04/17/plan-to-see-wolverine-seen-it-already/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is Wolverine so popular anyway? Is it because he&#8217;s almost indestructible? Maybe it&#8217;s the shiny adamantium claws. No, probably the hair. It&#8217;s definitely the hair.
For the ladies, it&#8217;s probably a little something about Hugh &#8220;Sexiest Man Alive&#8221; Jackman going feral in fight scenes. It makes perfect sense that ol&#8217; Logan, the reputed best there is at what he does, would be the first X-Man to get a solo film.
I have to say I&#8217;m pumped, as much for the event as I am for the film itself. This one is chock full of cameos from numerous mutants including Gambit, who [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sfuniverse.com">SF Universe</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Wolverine so popular anyway? Is it because he&#8217;s almost indestructible? Maybe it&#8217;s the shiny adamantium claws. No, probably the hair. It&#8217;s definitely the hair.</p>
<p>For the ladies, it&#8217;s probably a little something about Hugh &#8220;Sexiest Man Alive&#8221; Jackman going feral in fight scenes. It makes perfect sense that ol&#8217; Logan, the reputed best there is at what he does, would be the first X-Man to get a solo film.</p>
<p>I have to say I&#8217;m pumped, as much for the event as I am for the film itself. This one is chock full of cameos from numerous mutants including Gambit, who can blow things up by touching them. He&#8217;s also one of a handful of heroes from Louisiana. The other notable one being Swamp Thing, who&#8217;s kind of a tree.</p>
<p><em>X-Men Origins:Wolverine </em>will also show us fanboy favorite Emma Frost, who can transform herself into diamond and read minds. There&#8217;s The Blob, who can summon and harness gravitational fields and &#8211; oh heck, he&#8217;s really fat. The Blob got royally screwed on the mutant power scale. Readers, what are your thoughts about Wolverine? We&#8217;re assuming, of course, none of our readers would have downloaded that leaked copy we&#8217;re not supposed to know anything about.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><embed height="340" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LPmbGzQaOCs&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sfuniverse.com">SF Universe</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2009/04/17/plan-to-see-wolverine-seen-it-already/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Don&#8217;t Smell Like No Orc To Me, Bub!</title>
		<link>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2008/02/23/you-dont-smell-like-no-orc-to-me-bub/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2008/02/23/you-dont-smell-like-no-orc-to-me-bub/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominic Monaghan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.J. Abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord of the Rings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolverine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-Men]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfuniverse.com/2008/02/23/you-dont-smell-like-no-orc-to-me-bub/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Hobbit? Check. Drug-addled rock star seeking redemption while stranded on a mysterious island? Check. Dominic Monaghan can now add &#8220;electrically-powered mutant&#8221; to an already diverse resume.
Monaghan has signed on for a role in Fox&#8217;s Wolverine based X-Men prequel which focuses on the origins of Marvel Comics&#8217; most popular mutant. The Lord of the Rings and Lost star will play Barnell, a miltary ally of Wolverine&#8217;s with the power to harness energy.
X-Men Origins: Wolverine goes onto just about every screen in the country in May 2009, a week before J.J. Abrams&#8217; Star Trek revamp hits cinemas. I&#8217;ve taken to calling [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sfuniverse.com">SF Universe</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sfuniverse.com/files/2008/02/dominic-jpeg.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="244" alt="Dominic jpeg" src="http://www.sfuniverse.com/files/2008/02/dominic-jpeg-thumb.jpg" width="184" align="left" border="0"></a> Hobbit? Check. Drug-addled rock star seeking redemption while stranded on a mysterious island? Check. <strong>Dominic Monaghan</strong> can now add &#8220;electrically-powered mutant&#8221; to an already diverse resume.</p>
<p>Monaghan has signed on for a role in Fox&#8217;s <strong>Wolverine</strong> based X-Men prequel which focuses on the origins of Marvel Comics&#8217; most popular mutant. <strong>The Lord</strong> <strong>of the Rings</strong> and <strong>Lost </strong>star will play Barnell, a miltary ally of Wolverine&#8217;s with the power to harness energy.</p>
<p><strong>X-Men Origins: Wolverine </strong>goes onto just about every screen in the country in May 2009, a week before J.J. Abrams&#8217; <strong>Star Trek</strong> revamp hits cinemas. I&#8217;ve taken to calling the week-long stretch in between these two blockbusters &#8220;The Most Important Week in the History of the Human Evolutionary Process,&#8221; but I may be understating things a touch.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sfuniverse.com">SF Universe</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2008/02/23/you-dont-smell-like-no-orc-to-me-bub/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Star Trek Delay That Stole Christmas</title>
		<link>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2008/02/14/the-star-trek-delay-that-stole-christmas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2008/02/14/the-star-trek-delay-that-stole-christmas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.J. Abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolverine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-Men]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfuniverse.com/2008/02/14/the-star-trek-delay-that-stole-christmas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Star Trek lovers, we just got a lump of coal stuck in our warp drives. Variety is reporting Paramount has pushed J.J. Abrams&#8216; long-awaited take on the film franchise from Dec. 25 to May 9, 2009. The studio believes Star Trek will have more success as an early summer event film than as a Christmas holiday offering.
But there&#8217;s a ray of sci-fi sunshine here. The new release date puts Trek in cineplexes just one week after the release of X-Men Origins:Wolverine.&#160; That film attempts to capitalize on Wolverine&#8217;s eternal popularity and it has to because they killed all the [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sfuniverse.com">SF Universe</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sfuniverse.com/files/2008/02/star-trek-xi.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="244" alt="Star Trek XI" src="http://www.sfuniverse.com/files/2008/02/star-trek-xi-thumb.jpg" width="190" align="left" border="0"></a> </p>
<p>Star Trek lovers, we just got a lump of coal stuck in our warp drives. Variety is reporting Paramount has pushed <strong>J.J. Abrams</strong>&#8216; long-awaited take on the film franchise from Dec. 25 to May 9, 2009. The studio believes <strong>Star Trek </strong>will have more success as an early summer event film than as a Christmas holiday offering.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s a ray of sci-fi sunshine here. The new release date puts Trek in cineplexes just one week after the release of <strong>X-Men Origins:Wolverine.</strong>&nbsp; That film attempts to capitalize on Wolverine&#8217;s eternal popularity and it has to because they killed all the other important characters in <strong>X3. </strong>Anyone up for a Wolverine vs. <strong>Capt. Kirk</strong> fight? Now if we could only get <strong>Darth Vader </strong>to special guest referee.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sfuniverse.com">SF Universe</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sfuniverse.com/2008/02/14/the-star-trek-delay-that-stole-christmas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>